Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected and daddr was not specified

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <20030711.093546.12708723.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 11 Jul 
2003 09:35:46 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
says:

> In article <20030710233223.GA30577@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:32:23 
> +0200), Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> says:
> 
> > [EDESTADDRREQ]
> >     The socket is not connection-mode and does not have its peer
> >     address set, and no destination address was specified.
> > 
> > fixes sendmsg in ipv{4,6}/{raw,udp}
> 
> I aggeed on this, however we may want to do for whole tree at same time.
    ~~~~~~agreed
> How do you think, folks?

--yoshfuji