netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make sendmsg return EDESTADDRREQ if socket is not connected and daddr was not specified
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:35:46 +0900 (JST)
Cc: tgraf@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030710233223.GA30577@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20030710233223.GA30577@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20030710233223.GA30577@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:32:23 
+0200), Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> says:

> [EDESTADDRREQ]
>     The socket is not connection-mode and does not have its peer
>     address set, and no destination address was specified.
> 
> fixes sendmsg in ipv{4,6}/{raw,udp}

I aggeed on this, however we may want to do for whole tree at same time.
How do you think, folks?

--yoshfuji

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>