Re: [PATCH] netdev

netdev

Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops

To:	Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops
From:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:06:42 -0400
Cc:	"Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20030710112149.GC1939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization:	none
References:	<C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E0102229133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030710112149.GC1939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk

Matthew Wilcox wrote:

On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:47:13AM -0700, Feldman, Scott wrote:

Can we get a HAVE_NETDEV_OPS?



I'll seriously consider it ... once we have a better idea where this is
all going.  I'm a big fan of having _shared_ compatibility code rather
than something in each driver.  Obviously we'll want to share drivers
between 2.4 and 2.6.



Something like... oh... kcompat?  :)

http://sf.net/projects/gkernel/

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, (continued) Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Ben Greear Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Jeff Garzik Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Ben Greear Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Jeff Garzik Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Ben Greear Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Matthew Wilcox Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo RE: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Feldman, Scott Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Matthew Wilcox Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Jeff Garzik <= RE: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Feldman, Scott Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Jeff Garzik

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Matthew Wilcox
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH] Netfilter crossover module., James R. Leu
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Matthew Wilcox
Next by Thread:	RE: [PATCH] netdev_ops, Feldman, Scott
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]