[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops

To: scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netdev_ops
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: willy@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E0102229133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <C6F5CF431189FA4CBAEC9E7DD5441E0102229133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:47:13 -0700

   Can we get a HAVE_NETDEV_OPS?
Don't tell me you're seriously considering having _TWO_ copies
of all this code sitting around?

At that point backwards compat becomes absolutely rediculious.  If
it's important to you, just stick to the current scheme.  You gain
nothing by maintaining two copies of the same code.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>