Re: [PATCH] Don't call request_module() under spinlock in xfrm_get

netdev

Re: [PATCH] Don't call request_module() under spinlock in xfrm_get_type(

To:	jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Don't call request_module() under spinlock in xfrm_get_type()
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 08 Jul 2003 19:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<Mutt.LNX.4.44.0307062238010.468-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<Mutt.LNX.4.44.0307062238010.468-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

   From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 22:42:40 +1000 (EST)

   This patch fixes a problem where request_module() was being called
   under the lock taken in xfrm_policy_get_afinfo().

Looks good, applied.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] Don't call request_module() under spinlock in xfrm_get_type(), James Morris Re: [PATCH] Don't call request_module() under spinlock in xfrm_get_type(), David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Question about netlink, kuznet
Next by Date:	Re: shutdown() and SHUT_RD on TCP sockets - broken?, mtk-lists
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] Don't call request_module() under spinlock in xfrm_get_type(), James Morris
Next by Thread:	Re: question about linux tcp request queue handling, Nivedita Singhvi
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]