| To: | kohei@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IP-ID field of ICMP echo request |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Jul 2003 22:11:19 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, solt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.51.0307071443080.3379@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.51.0307071420020.2129@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030707.213930.07095787.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0307071443080.3379@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <Pine.LNX.4.51.0307071443080.3379@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:48:41 +0200 (CEST)), Maciej Soltysiak <solt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > > No, he is not talking about ICMP Identifier (RFC792 Page 14), > > but IP Identification (RFC791 Page 29). > Aah, yes, I misread. Sorry. > > Anyway I tested it on 2.4.2 and 2.4.18, 2.5.74 and 2.4.21, they set IP ID > to 0. At first I thought it was that issue with early 2.4, but it seems it > has been there for a while. It seems linux-2.2.22 behaves similarly. Well..., I remember the DF bit. Kohei, add "-M dont" option (do not set DF flag) and we can see non-zero IPID, can't we? -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IP-ID field of ICMP echo request, Maciej Soltysiak |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Unaccepted Connections, Steve G |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IP-ID field of ICMP echo request, Maciej Soltysiak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IP-ID field of ICMP echo request, Ulisses |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |