| To: | Jeff Sipek <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH - RFC] [1/5] 64-bit network statistics - generic net |
| From: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 05 Jul 2003 14:46:33 -0700 |
| Cc: | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200307051449.32934.jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Candela Technologies |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307032005340.8468-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200307051449.32934.jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529 |
Jeff Sipek wrote: Using KB would give us additional 10 bits (making the overflow at 4 TB.) I don't really like the idea of using MB, but the underlying idea is the same - 20 more bits, making the limit 4 PB.What is the consensus on this way of solving the problem? I guess it could be useful for something like ifconfig, but serious applications will need more precision and should deal with wraps anyway (even on 64-bits, in my opinion..why have to fix bugs in 10 years because we were too lazy to take the 10 minutes to make it right now). Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH - RFC] [1/5] 64-bit network statistics - generic net, Jeff Sipek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | tc stack overflow, Thomas Heinz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH - RFC] [1/5] 64-bit network statistics - generic net, Alan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] Tunnel device init patch, Ville Nuorvala |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |