netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.4.21

To: krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Prefix List and O/M flags against 2.4.21
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:22:09 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307171413100.1353-100000@DYN318430.beaverton.ibm.com>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307171336430.1353-100000@DYN318430.beaverton.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307171413100.1353-100000@DYN318430.beaverton.ibm.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article 
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0307171413100.1353-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 
17 Jul 2003 15:06:02 -0700 (PDT)), Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> The same patch against 2.4.21

Hmm, you seems still misunderstanding some of our points. :-p
Alexey says we may want to use ifi_family for per-interface L3 information
including M/O bits. 
At least, new RTM_xxx should not be restricted to get such flags.

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>