| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 29 Jun 2003 23:07:07 +0100 |
| Cc: | greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030629.141528.74734144.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | |
| References: | <3EFC9203.3090508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030627.144426.71096593.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1056755070.5463.12.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030629.141528.74734144.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sul, 2003-06-29 at 22:15, David S. Miller wrote: > You keep saying that lost information is bad and serves no > positive purpose, and I totally disagree. Drops are litmus tests > for the patch/report, they also serve to educate the submitters. What you don't get is that like you I'm distributing work. I'm getting end users to spot bug correlations - and thats why I want better tools Report bug should get Your bug looks like #1131 #4151 or #11719 (Resolved), please check |
| Previous by Date: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, Davide Libenzi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |