| To: | alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:03:28 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1056827972.6295.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1056755336.5459.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030627.172123.78713883.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1056827972.6295.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 28 Jun 2003 20:19:32 +0100 On Sad, 2003-06-28 at 01:21, David S. Miller wrote: > I respond to private reports with "please send this to the lists, > what if I were on vacation for the next month?" I never actually > process or analyze such reports. Which means you miss stuff. Not my problem Alan. If the user gives a crap about their report mattering, they'll do what I ask them to do. If users send their report to the wrong place, it will get lost, just like if their cat their report into /dev/null. I have no reason to feel bad about the information getting lost. If it's too much for them to do as I ask, it's too much for me to consider their report. Bug reporting, just like patch submission, is a 2 way street. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: routing bug report for 2.4, Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: routing bug report for 2.4, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, Alan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, Alan Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |