| To: | "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org |
| From: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:14:32 -0700 |
| Cc: | bcollins@xxxxxxxxxx, davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <35240000.1056760723@[10.10.2.4]> |
| References: | <20030626.224739.88478624.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <21740000.1056724453@[10.10.2.4]> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306270749020.4137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030627.143738.41641928.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306271454490.4457@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030627213153.GR501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030627162527.714091ce.akpm@xxxxxxxxx> <35240000.1056760723@[10.10.2.4]> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think your suggestion of sending new bugs out to LKML has made a big > dent in the one<->one problem already. Replacing all the default owner > fields with mailing lists (either existing ones or new ones) instead of > individuals would be another step in that direction, though there may > be a few hurdles to deal with on the way to that. > > Yes, we probably also need an "email back in" interface as we've > discussed before to take it up to many-many. Both these things would help heaps - the tracking system then becomes invisible, basically. The best of both. Can we make it so? |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] IPV6: use macro for M-Flag and clean-up, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, Martin J. Bligh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, Martin J. Bligh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |