netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org

To: lm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030627225305.GA13785@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030627.144426.71096593.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <1230000.1056754041@[10.10.2.4]> <20030627225305.GA13785@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: Larry McVoy <lm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:53:05 -0700

       - one key observation: let bugs "expire" much like news expires.  If
         nobody has been whining enough that it gets into the high signal 
         bug db then it probably isn't real.  We really want a way where no
         activity means let it expire.

I want more than time based expiry, I want expiry for me that
is controlled by me.  When I delete the notification email in
my mailbox, I never want to see that bug again unless I want to.

This effectively degrades into list posting based bug reports and my
current email inbox, which is what I'm advocating to use :-)

When I see the "me too, heres some more info" response to the list
posting, then I'm interested and I'll reread the list thread to
digest all the information to see what I can make of it.  When this
happens bugs basically fix themselves, and this occurs only because
of the acts taken on by the reporters of the bug not me.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>