| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org |
| From: | Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:11:53 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030627.150248.08328103.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306270749020.4137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030627.143738.41641928.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306271454490.4457@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030627.150248.08328103.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:02:00 -0700 (PDT) > > David, your method is the dream of every software developer. > > It is not a dream, it works perfectly fine and has done so > for 5+ years of Linux maintainence. > > To make these things scale you MUST push the work out to other people, > you absolutely cannot centralize. And here we're pushing it out to > the bug reporters, just like we push the work of patch maintainence to > the patch submitters. > > If they don't care about the bug and won't retransmit when their > stuff isn't being looked at, their bug isn't worth being looked > at. David, I'm not willing to waste both precious time arguing on this but I will leave you question to think about. Is a bug report more useful for the user of a "system" or for the "system" itself ? - Davide |
| Previous by Date: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |