| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org |
| From: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jun 2003 14:54:26 -0700 |
| Cc: | davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mbligh@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030627.143738.41641928.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Candela Technologies |
| References: | <20030626.224739.88478624.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <21740000.1056724453@[10.10.2.4]> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306270749020.4137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030627.143738.41641928.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529 |
David S. Miller wrote: From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:56:16 -0700 (PDT)The good of a bug tracking system against the mailing list is thatbugs do survive in a bug tracking system, No, this is the _BAD_ part, shit accumulates equally with useful reports. Useful reports in non-bugtracking system environments get retransmitted and eventually looked at. I think you are putting too much work on the bug reporter(s). If you want to ignore bug reports that only happen once, feel free, but give the rest of us a way to easily keep a history and list of bug reports. For instance, where is the list of open networking bugs for 2.4 now? -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Prefix List against 2.5.70 (re-done), David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |