| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Prefix List against 2.5.70 (re-done) |
| From: | Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jun 2003 08:45:19 -0700 |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030626.230727.35666164.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | IBM |
| References: | <3EF9D5C2.5080101@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030625.234251.116353369.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <3EFB2017.5030202@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030626.230727.35666164.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 |
rtnetlink_rcv_msg() calls dumpit() (via netlink_dump_start) only for those messages for which the last two bits are binary '10'. So I had to use these values. All the other *GET* macros use the same semantics. thanks, - KK David S. Miller wrote: From: Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 09:32:23 -0700 I still have problems with this patch.-#define RTM_MAX (RTM_BASE+31)+#define RTM_GETLNKFLAGS (RTM_BASE+34) + +#define RTM_GETPLIST (RTM_BASE+38) Please allocate contiguous numbers to the new messages, don't skip around like this. Thanks. (this of course means you have to redo your 2.4.x patch as well) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH, untested] Support for PPPOE on SMP, James Carlson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: e1000 lockup with port io type reset, Feldman, Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Prefix List against 2.5.70 (re-done), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Prefix List against 2.5.70 (re-done), David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |