| To: | ak@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Make xfrm subsystem optional |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 14 Jun 2003 02:27:02 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030614091631.GA16993@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030614091631.GA16993@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:16:31 +0200 This patches only compiles the xfrm subsystem in when any of the options using it are selected. This shrinks the text segment on an amd64 kernel by ~32k, data by ~6k, bss by ~33k, overall ~72K memory saved. I'm not going to apply this, sorry Andi. I want the freedom to use the XFRM layer for generic things at some point. How about working on making the xfrm layer more lean instead? :) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Make xfrm subsystem optional, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Make xfrm subsystem optional, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Make xfrm subsystem optional, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Make xfrm subsystem optional, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |