netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4)

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4)
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 09:18:36 +1000
Cc: haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx, hdierks@xxxxxxxxxx, scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx, dwg@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, milliner@xxxxxxxxxx, ricardoz@xxxxxxxxxx, twichell@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030613.154634.74748085.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <OF0078342A.E131D4B1-ON85256D44.0051F7C0@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1055521263.3531.2055.camel@nighthawk> <20030613223841.GB32097@krispykreme> <20030613.154634.74748085.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
> Not really... one retransmit and the TCP header size grows
> due to the SACK options.

OK scratch that idea.

> I find it truly bletcherous what you're trying to do here.

I think so too, but its hard to ignore ~100Mbit/sec in performance.

> Why not instead find out if it's possible to have the e1000
> fetch the entire cache line where the first byte of the packet
> resides?  Even ancient designes like SunHME do that.

Rusty and I were wondering why the e1000 didnt do that exact thing.

Scott: is it possible to enable such a thing?

Anton

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>