| To: | "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:09:04 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <87he6wbdkz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Florian Weimer's message of "Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:48:12 +0200") |
| Mail-followup-to: | "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306101432530.21247-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030610075702.I37165@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306101125500.21435@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <87he6wbdkz.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yes, these numbers keep growing. By today's standards, 6000 Mbps Oops, that's one "0" too many. 6 Gbps is definitely still surprising. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.5.70+] tun using alloc_netdev, Max Krasnyansky |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2.5.70] acenic -- update to use alloc_etherdev, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Route cache performance under stress, CIT/Paul |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, chas williams |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |