netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Route cache performance under stress

To: ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, ralph@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306101956520.7801@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306101725020.17226@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030610.152020.59678979.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306101956520.7801@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@xxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:58:47 -0400 (EDT)

   On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, David S. Miller wrote:
   
   > Every packet records a timestamp.
   
   I'm not aware of anything in IP routing that requires a timestamp for
   every packet.  To me it sounds like we could rip that out too.

Guess you never run tcpdump nor use packet schedulers.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>