| To: | Henrik Petander <lpetande@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6 |
| From: | Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2003 00:40:44 +0900 |
| Cc: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ajtuomin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jagana@xxxxxxxxxx, kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3EE5F85E.9080006@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20030606223057.41ac1c9d.nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.44.0306091140470.25126-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030609203659.089b241b.nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3EE5F85E.9080006@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:25:18 +0300 Henrik Petander <lpetande@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Then the policies for mipv6 would need to be specified at the same time > as the ipsec policies. This is not a problem as long as the policies are > loaded at start up. However, this could lead to problems with > applications which specify their own policies, e.g. racoon. How about providing interface of handling templates to update existing policy in kernel? Regards, -- Masahide NAKAMURA |
| Previous by Date: | RE: Route cache performance under stress, Ralph Doncaster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, Henrik Petander |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |