| To: | CIT/Paul <xerox@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:03:19 -0400 (EDT) |
| Cc: | "'Simon Kirby'" <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'David S. Miller'" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <008001c32eda$56760830$4a00000a@badass> |
| References: | <008001c32eda$56760830$4a00000a@badass> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, CIT/Paul wrote: > NAPI despises SMP.. Any SMP box we run NAPI on has major packet loss > under high load.. So I find that the e1000 ITR works just as well > And there is no reason for NAPI at this point. > Foo, you on cheap crack again? Please just try the tests as described if you want to help. It doesnt help anyone when you wildly wave your hands like that. Why dont we take you offline - give me access to your machine i have a couple of hours to kill. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Route cache performance under stress, Ralph Doncaster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Route cache performance under stress, Ralph Doncaster |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |