| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:39:56 +0200 |
| Cc: | sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030609.015648.55736734.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030608.225837.115923841.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <001801c32e50$57ef0750$4a00000a@badass> <20030609071330.GD20613@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030609.015648.55736734.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
David S. Miller writes: > BTW, ignoring juno, Robert Olsson has some pktgen hacks that allow > that to generate new-dst-per-packet DoS like traffic. It's much > more effective than Juno-z > > Robert could you should these guys your hacks to do that? Sure. What a discussion... Well I'm happy for the past lazy days. I've include some references in the experiment from last week and it should be interesting for people in this discussion. Summary: Forwarding experiment with different rates of new incoming destinations/sec. Ranging from DoS attack to single destination flow. With full 123k routes. http://robur.slu.se/Linux/net-development/experiments/router-flow-test.html Your latest patch looks interesting... good thinking. Operations and tuning would be simplier. Hope to have time for a test tomorrow. Testing is very manual work still. Cheers. --ro |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Simon Kirby |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Robert Olsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |