| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netlink tester program |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 09 Jun 2003 10:16:15 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | etsh_cucu@xxxxxxxxx, david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx, rddunlap@xxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030608212033.Y33230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030603075742.34434.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030608212033.Y33230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:35:09 -0400 (EDT) Netlink2 draft is work in progress. The draft tends to lag reality. I believe what you refer to has been fixed. Refer to the slides at: http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~rha/netlink2.pdf ... Consider netlink2 as a distributed netlink. Beautiful, if you're going to allow this protocol to go over the wire, you have to choose a network byte order and swap in/out of it. Should be fun :) Unfortunately I see no mention of this issue in the slides, should I be scared? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.5.70] Add release_netdev -- hook for sysfs/net device cleanup, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netlink tester program, Mr. James W. Laferriere |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netlink tester program, John S. Denker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |