| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jun 2003 01:31:59 -0700 |
| Cc: | xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030609.012202.68055632.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030609065211.GB20613@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030608.235622.38700262.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030609081803.GF20613@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030609.012202.68055632.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:22:02AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > Hmm...It looks like this is still freeing the entry.. Is it possible to > recycle the dst without reallocating it? > > Yes, can you test the patch I just sent you? We can modify that > to recycle easily instead of freeing. Cool. I'll see if I can set something up to try that at work tomorrow. Insufficient hardware here at home. > We spend a decent amount of time mucking with fib rules, turning > off multiple-tables support would kill that, although I suspect > you're actually using that :) We use it occasionally for various things. I'll try profiling with it turned off to see how much of an impact it has. Simon- |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Simon Kirby |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |