netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] Prefix List patch against 2.5.70

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prefix List patch against 2.5.70
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 21:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306030746420.8936-100000@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <OF0DFD7FB1.3567B088-ON88256D39.00724E19@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306030746420.8936-100000@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:48:13 +0300 (EEST)
   
   Umm.. every prefix should have an interface route, so they're a required 
   subset of the routing table, correct?

That's entirely correct, thanks for noticing this :-)

This is why I said that they could add to a global list
all routes that meet this criteria.  Thus making any
querying mechanism simple to implement.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] Prefix List patch against 2.5.70, Pekka Savola
Next by Date:  Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, Ville Nuorvala
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] Prefix List patch against 2.5.70, Pekka Savola
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] Prefix List patch against 2.5.70, David Stevens
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]