netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4)

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4)
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 23:27:55 -0700
Cc: ltd@xxxxxxxxx, anton@xxxxxxxxx, haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx, hdierks@xxxxxxxxxx, scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx, dwg@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, milliner@xxxxxxxxxx, ricardoz@xxxxxxxxxx, twichell@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030613.231418.39160686.davem@redhat.com>
Mail-followup-to: William Lee Irwin III <wli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, ltd@xxxxxxxxx, anton@xxxxxxxxx, haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx, hdierks@xxxxxxxxxx, scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx, dwg@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, milliner@xxxxxxxxxx, ricardoz@xxxxxxxxxx, twichell@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy
References: <20030613.224122.104034261.davem@redhat.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20030614154954.026b4768@mira-sjcm-3.cisco.com> <20030613.230850.85410095.davem@redhat.com> <20030613.231418.39160686.davem@redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:14:18PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Folks, can we remove whatever member of this CC: list creates
> bounces that say:
> Your message to Linux_news awaits moderator approval
> Ok?  I can't guess which one it is because these all look
> like normal people's email addresses (except possibly the
> haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx thing, maybe that's the one)

That's legitimate, but I'm still trying to convince the BKL brigade
that he should have chosen something more eponymous e.g. dhansen. =)


-- wli

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>