[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Route cache performance under stress

To: CIT/Paul <xerox@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Route cache performance under stress
From: Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:03:19 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: "'Simon Kirby'" <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'David S. Miller'" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <008001c32eda$56760830$4a00000a@badass>
References: <008001c32eda$56760830$4a00000a@badass>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, CIT/Paul wrote:

> NAPI despises SMP.. Any SMP box we run NAPI on has major packet loss
> under high load.. So I find that the e1000 ITR works just as well
> And there is no reason for NAPI at this point.

Foo, you on cheap crack again?
Please just try the tests as described if you want to help. It doesnt help
anyone when you wildly wave your hands like that.

Why dont we take you offline - give me access to your machine i have a
couple of hours to kill.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>