| To: | fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 May 2003 23:32:11 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <87wuge59w2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <87adda6uro.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030526.002934.132904126.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <87wuge59w2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 11:34:37 +0200 Of course, this will result in vastly decreased functionality (no arbitary netmasks, no policy-based routing, code will be fine-tuned for typical Internet routing tables), so this proposal definitely comes at a price. As a general purpose operating system, where people DO in fact use these features quite regularly, we cannot make these kinds of choices without making it optional and definiteily non-default behavior. |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] 2.4.x net driver pending stuff, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] post-sysfs netdev cleanup, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Florian Weimer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Simon Kirby |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |