netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Route cache performance under stress

To: ak@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 01:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: gandalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030523102113.4fe38159.ak@xxxxxxx>
References: <1053602138.9475.34.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030522.180152.15252868.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030523102113.4fe38159.ak@xxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
   From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
   Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 10:21:13 +0200

   On Thu, 22 May 2003 18:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
   "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
   
   > Actually, get_order() aparently only works on powers of
   > two, which 'size' is definitely not.
   
   Are you sure? I always used it on all kinds of sizes.
   
   The algorithm looks for me like it works on any size. A quick test
   confirms that too.

I believe you.

Then what does that comment above it mean? :-)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>