| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] switch sdla to initcalls |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 May 2003 12:31:23 +0200 |
| Cc: | hch@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030521.013453.118618445.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030521081938.GD22869@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030521102512.A30373@xxxxxx> <20030521082630.GF22869@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030521.013453.118618445.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 21 May 2003 01:34:53 -0700 (PDT) "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have to admit that I must feign ignorance here. And that someone > who really understands the EISA/ISA probe ordering requirements > should document them as best as possible in Space.c I doubt anybody understands it. It is just lots of hard earned ad-hoc experience distilled in these files. It's basically untestable/unknown because you'll likely have a hard time to find such a card anymore. And even if you had you would need the other ISA cards that could possible conflicts to test all combinations - impossible task. For such unsolvable problems it is best to leave it untouched because it cannot be tested. Either that or remove the driver completely. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender, Russell King |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] switch sdla to initcalls, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] switch sdla to initcalls, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] switch sdla to initcalls, Paul Gortmaker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |