| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 May 2003 19:31:19 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200305210222.GAA13659@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030520.175553.35669773.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <200305210222.GAA13659@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 06:22:10 +0400 (MSD) > Russel, please retest using this patch. This piece of > code needs to be audited further. Relax, it is right now. I hope it is the only place where route is copied as whole. I explicitly zeroed out child and xfrm in my final version. These should never be non-NULL, it is pure paranoia on my part :-) IP6 makes this more intelligently using ip6_route_copy() function. We should probably make similar beast for ipv4 just for clarity's sake. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Patch for NETLINK_TCPDIAG, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Patch for NETLINK_TCPDIAG, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender, Russell King |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |