[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Layer-7 Filter for Linux QoS]

To: Ethan Sommer <sommere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] Layer-7 Filter for Linux QoS]
From: Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 08:14:44 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3EC9B815.4000504@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1053313298.3909.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030519202756.I39498@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3EC9B815.4000504@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 20 May 2003, Ethan Sommer wrote:

> I picked Spencer's mainly because it was a pain to port the glibc
> version into kernel space. They are both basically the posix regexp
> interface, so if someone wants to get another version working in kernel
> space we can test and see which one performs better with real load
> pretty easily.

Take a look at snorts implementation. I think snort is GPL so you may
just be able to borrow it.

> Yep. We haven't spent a lot of time on optimizations. Obviously that
> example can be fixed pretty quickly... except I'm not sure we can avoid
> it and stay thread safe? (linux can route multiple packets at the same
> time on an smp box right? so we can't just use a staically defined
> buffer...)

Your problem seesm to be the regexp scheme used. You dont need a static
buffer i think. You should be able to operate on an incoming packet


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>