| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 May 2003 18:24:10 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030519212209.P39592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030520011053.GB10419@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030519.181405.35017608.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030519212209.P39592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 21:23:08 -0400 (EDT) Also used to attack CISCOs by them kiddies btw. We stand much better than any CISCO doing caching. I have to assume that the source address selection operates differently for attacking cisco equiptment, our hashes being identical would really be unbelievable :-) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Jamal Hadi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Jamal Hadi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |