[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Route cache performance under stress

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress
From: Jamal Hadi <hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 21:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030519.181405.35017608.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.51.0305191408490.1795@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030519154852.I39024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030520011053.GB10419@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030519.181405.35017608.davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 19 May 2003, David S. Miller wrote:

> I bet you have been, the weakness in the hash has been very well
> publicized and the script kiddies aren't using the truly random
> version of the attacks anymore.  Just google for juno-z.101f.c, this
> (or some derivative) is the DoS people attack program are actually
> using.

Also used to attack CISCOs by them kiddies btw. We stand much better
than any CISCO doing caching.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>