| To: | akumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SIOCETHTOOL history ? |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 06 May 2003 04:49:26 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <01f301c313cc$4e6cb8b0$243205c0@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <01f301c313cc$4e6cb8b0$243205c0@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: "arun" <akumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 18:07:48 +0530
I have used SIOCGMIIPHY before and it seemed not to require
any su rights or capabilities.
Yes it does:
/*
* These ioctl calls:
* - require superuser power.
* - require strict serialization.
* - return a value
*/
case SIOCETHTOOL:
case SIOCGMIIPHY:
case SIOCGMIIREG:
if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | SIOCETHTOOL history ?, arun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SIOCETHTOOL history ?, arun |
| Previous by Thread: | SIOCETHTOOL history ?, arun |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SIOCETHTOOL history ?, arun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |