netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Route cache performance under stress

To: Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Route cache performance under stress
From: Martin Josefsson <gandalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 22 May 2003 15:03:07 +0200
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030522114438.GD2961@netnation.com>
Organization:
References: <20030520.173607.88482742.davem@redhat.com> <20030522084003.GA22613@netnation.com> <20030522.015815.91322249.davem@redhat.com> <20030522.034058.71558626.davem@redhat.com> <20030522114438.GD2961@netnation.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 13:44, Simon Kirby wrote:

> Nice!  I tested with 300,000 routing table entries and there is no
> discernable difference in performance from having an empty table. 
> vmstat shows the same idle time as when the routing table is empty.

How much memory does a table that large use?

-- 
/Martin

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>