netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] qdisc oops fix

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qdisc oops fix
From: Catalin BOIE <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:47:21 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: Catalin BOIE <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tomas Szepe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030417065352.S6710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030415084706.O1131@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0304160838001.25861@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030416072952.E4013@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3E9D755A.8060601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030416142802.E5912@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0304170844410.23586@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030417065352.S6710@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Ok, I stand corrected. Tomas is right- same problem. You had htb loaded
> as a module, the other person had it compiled in ;->
> Get yourself upgraded ;->
I surely will!

>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Catalin BOIE wrote:
>
> > > Catalin, Can you what kernel that is?
> >
> > 2.4.20pre10 works ok but 2.4.20 crash.
> > With traffic -> no crash with 2.4.20. Without traffic, on other machine,
> > no crash.
> >
> >
> > > > It's triggered, because someone does something like
> > > >     spin_lock_bh(&my_lock);
> > > >     p = kmalloc(,GFP_KERNEL);
> > > >
> > > > I don't like the proposed fix: usually code that calls
> > > > kmalloc(,GFP_KERNEL) assumes that it runs at process space, e.g. uses
> > > > semaphores, or non-bh spinlocks, etc.
> > > > slab just happens to contain a test that complains about illegal calls.
> > >
> > > ok. Nice.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >>Trace; c0127e0f <kmalloc+eb/110>
> > > > >>Trace; c01d3cac <qdisc_create_dflt+20/bc>
> > > > >>Trace; d081ecc7 <END_OF_CODE+1054ff0f/????>
> > > > >>Trace; c01d5265 <tc_ctl_tclass+1cd/214>
> > > > >>Trace; d0820600 <END_OF_CODE+10551848/????>
> > > > >>Trace; c01d27e4 <rtnetlink_rcv+298/3bc>
> > > > >>Trace; c01d0605 <__neigh_event_send+89/1b4>
> > > > >>Trace; c01d7cd4 <netlink_data_ready+1c/60>
> > > > >>Trace; c01d7730 <netlink_unicast+230/278>
> > > > >>Trace; c01d7b73 <netlink_sendmsg+1fb/20c>
> > > > >>Trace; c01c79d5 <sock_sendmsg+69/88>
> > > > >>Trace; c01c8b48 <sys_sendmsg+18c/1e8>
> > > > >>Trace; c0120010 <map_user_kiobuf+8/f8>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > I don't understand the backtrace. Were any modules loaded? Perhaps
> > > > 0xd081ecc7 is a module.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Probably a module. Again Catalin, run no modules.
> > It's a production machine. I cannot test this. We plan to replace the
> > machine, so I can test then.
> >
> > > > I'd add a
> > > >     if(in_interrupt()) show_stack(NULL);
> > > > into qdisc_create_dflt(), and try to reproduce the bug without modules.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Catalin - again instead of your fix can you please add this call?
> > See above. I cannot test now. I'm very sorry!
> >
> > > cheers,
> > > jamal
> > >
> >
> > ---
> > Catalin(ux) BOIE
> > catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
>

---
Catalin(ux) BOIE
catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>