netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] qdisc oops fix

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qdisc oops fix
From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 23:44:23 +0200
Cc: Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Catalin BOIE <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030416140440.O5912@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20030415084706.O1131@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030416160606.GA32575@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3E9D8A68.5050207@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200304162003.06600.m.c.p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030416140440.O5912@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
> [hadi@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >
> > > >The original backtrace as provided by Martin Volf does not contain
> > > >any weird addresses such as 0xd081ecc7 above:
> > > >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=105013596721774&w=2
> > > Thanks.
> > > The bug was caused by sch_tree_lock() in htb_change_class().
> > > 2.4.21-pre7 contains a fix.
> > am I just blind or isn't there a fix in -pre7|current-BK?
> >
> 
> No you are not ;-> Yes, the fix for that specific problem is in
> 2.4.21-pre7. I think Tomas might have missed that we moved on to the
> next problem.

Trouble is, the fix went in for already -pre5 (cset 1.930.3.5), so if you
only look at the pre6->pre7 changelog (like I did), you aren't likely to
find it.  8)

T.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>