[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface

To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] ICMPv6 MIB stats per-interface
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:12:36 -0700
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030416.030710.19512552.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: OSDL
References: <20030414095030.50ad9652.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> <20030415.021728.70559400.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030415093442.0913486d.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> <20030416.030710.19512552.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 03:07:10 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ 
<yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| In article <20030415093442.0913486d.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 15 Apr 2003 
09:34:42 -0700), "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> says:
| > Do you have any updates (recommendations) on how to proceed on this?
| > Have you looked at my patch file?
| Yes.  I looked at the patch.
| I also learned about seqfile.
| Now I'm typing procfs seqfile part.
| I'll send you my (uncompleted) patch.

I can help with seq_file if you need it.

| I think per-cpu * per-interface.
| and, I believe statictics should be held in inet6_dev{}.
| We need ipv6 part, too.  Would you work on this?
| (I don't have enough time to complete this in April...)

Yes, I'll begin on IPv6 statistics.

| > I think that we can make some progress without having an answer to
| > your question about /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/foobar file renaming.
| Sure.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>