| To: | toml@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Apr 2003 14:07:27 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1049234673.5116.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1049234673.5116.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Tom Lendacky <toml@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01 Apr 2003 16:04:32 -0600
Please review and let me know if any changes are required.
Ok, now that I look at this I realize my suggestions from the other
day were wrong.
These expressions are huge, it's almost less readable. Let's compact
this, by creating a struct named {ip,ipv6}_esp_header_no_enc_data.
How about that?
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, Tom Lendacky |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes], Jason Lunz |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, Tom Lendacky |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |