RE: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes]

["Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>]

> A better approximation I think but probably not the last...

Thanks for you help guys!  I broke NAPI (don't hate me) and then went on
vacation, so I apologize for not responding sooner.  I like what you've
come up with here, so I'll turn the patch around for Jeff to update 2.5
e1000.

> +       e1000_clean_tx_irq(adapter);
> +       e1000_clean_rx_irq(adapter, &work_done, work_to_do);

Just curious, why give priority to Tx over Rx?

-scott