[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] qdisc oops fix

To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qdisc oops fix
From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:06:06 +0200
Cc: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Catalin BOIE <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
> [manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>Trace; c0127e0f <kmalloc+eb/110>
> >>Trace; c01d3cac <qdisc_create_dflt+20/bc>
> >>Trace; d081ecc7 <END_OF_CODE+1054ff0f/????>
> >>Trace; c01d5265 <tc_ctl_tclass+1cd/214>
> >>Trace; d0820600 <END_OF_CODE+10551848/????>
> >>Trace; c01d27e4 <rtnetlink_rcv+298/3bc>
> >>Trace; c01d0605 <__neigh_event_send+89/1b4>
> >>Trace; c01d7cd4 <netlink_data_ready+1c/60>
> >>Trace; c01d7730 <netlink_unicast+230/278>
> >>Trace; c01d7b73 <netlink_sendmsg+1fb/20c>
> >>Trace; c01c79d5 <sock_sendmsg+69/88>
> >>Trace; c01c8b48 <sys_sendmsg+18c/1e8>
> >>Trace; c0120010 <map_user_kiobuf+8/f8>
> >>
> I don't understand the backtrace. Were any modules loaded? Perhaps 
> 0xd081ecc7 is a module.

The original backtrace as provided by Martin Volf does not contain
any weird addresses such as 0xd081ecc7 above:

Tomas Szepe <szepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>