| To: | jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPSec: setkey -DP freezes machine |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 03 Mar 2003 01:34:51 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | toml@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303010205360.27480-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <OF2046BAB2.15FCD4CE-ON86256CDA.006CD0E3-86256CDA.0078C74D@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303010205360.27480-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 03:01:04 +1100 (EST) Alternatively, a family parameter could be added to the compile_policy() operation, but this duplicates data already present in our native xfrm_userpolicy_info format. I like this solution, it seems the cleanest. Could someone implement this fix and send me the patch? I'm very backlogged for the next day or so... |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Use C99 initializers in net/ipv6, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] Re: IPSec: setkey -DP freezes machine, James Morris |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Use C99 initializers in net/ipv6, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] Re: IPSec: setkey -DP freezes machine, James Morris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |