netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: skb_padto and small fragmented transmits

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: skb_padto and small fragmented transmits
From: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06 Feb 2003 11:22:51 -0800
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <BD9B60A108C4D511AAA10002A50708F20BA2AAD1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization:
References: <BD9B60A108C4D511AAA10002A50708F20BA2AAD1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 03:58, David S. Miller wrote:

> skb_padto() only works on linear skb.

The result is always a linear skb.  Given that skb_padto() takes into
account data_len (incorrectly, but still) and skb_pad() contains a
comment about non-linear skb always having zero tailroom, it certainly
looks like these were written with the attempt to work for non-linear
buffers.

I fail to see how the statement "skb->len + skb->data_len" has any
usable meaning, or how it can be anything other than a bug.

The checksum issue I mentioned is not as clear.  I haven't looked at all
the callers of skb_copy_expand() and copy_skb_header() to see what
effect copying ip_summed in one of those calls might have elsewhere.

> And if you look at all the drivers where it is used, they
> do not enable things like scatter-gather.

So because the problem is not currently exposed, it's acceptable for the
code to be incorrect?

-- Chris


diff -aur a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h    2003-01-13 12:45:20.000000000 -0800
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h    2003-02-05 12:25:38.000000000 -0800
@@ -1102,7 +1102,7 @@
  
 static inline struct sk_buff *skb_padto(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
 {
-       unsigned int size = skb->len + skb->data_len;
+       unsigned int size = skb->len;
        if (likely(size >= len))
                return skb;
        return skb_pad(skb, len-size);




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>