| To: | Alan <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size) |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:39:12 -0500 |
| Cc: | Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1043115448.13142.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20030117145357.GA1139@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030117160840.GR12676@xxxxxxxxxx> <20030117162818.GA1074@xxxxxxx> <20030117172719.GA31343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20030117174928.GA8304@xxxxxxx> <1043115448.13142.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202 |
Alan wrote: I've had no reports I remember about it breaking stuff, and several that it fixed stuff. It also seems to match the documentation. Its been in -ac for ages Andrew wrote: I've seen no reports either way, and appear to have misplaced the datasheet. May as well run with it. Sounds good. Dave, whatever your preference for patching handling is, is all good. I guess yourself, myself, and akpm are all patch-mongering candidates...
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | non-growing tcp window size, Håkon Bugge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Document, big |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size), Alan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size, Ducrot Bruno |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |