netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: pci-skeleton duplex check

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pci-skeleton duplex check
From: Donald Becker <becker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:56:17 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1039771036.1509.5.camel@rth.ninka.net>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 13 Dec 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 17:18, Donald Becker wrote:
> > Or perhaps recognizing that when someone that has been a significant,
> > continuous contributer since the early days of Linux
> 
> Until you learn to play nice with people and mesh within the
> fabric of Linux development, I adamently do not classify you
> as you appear to self-classify yourself.  You don't contribute,
> you sit in your sandbox and then point fingers at the people who
> do know how to work with other human beings and say "see how much
> that stuff sucks?  well my stuff works, nyah!"
..
> If Linux itself is worse off and went backwards in time for a while...

The development criteria used to be technically based, and that is still
the public statement.  Now, as your statement makes clear, working code
is an irrelevant criteria.

You comments immediately moved the subject from the technical merit and
correctness of the code to an ad hominem attack.  The facts, and the
code, clearly show the long term interaction and contribution.  In most
cases the code and interfaces we are talking about were written and
defined by me throughout the past decade.



-- 
Donald Becker                           becker@xxxxxxxxx
Scyld Computing Corporation             http://www.scyld.com
410 Severn Ave. Suite 210               Scyld Beowulf cluster system
Annapolis MD 21403                      410-990-9993


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>