| To: | Donald Becker <becker@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ifconfig TX/RX errors |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Nov 2002 21:00:08 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Cheng Jin <chengjin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211082012160.13934-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Donald Becker wrote: > On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Cheng Jin wrote: > > > What does a large number of RX/TX errors from ifconfig output generally > > mean? Does it also include drop/overruns/frame errors? > > The 'ifconfig' program doesn't have a defined behavior. It reads > /proc/net/dev and sums some of the available error counts. You should > read /proc/net/dev directly to find out what is going wrong. > Actually, unbelievable as it may sound, the ifconfig data matches SNMP stats as defined in RFC1213 interfaces table; same with things like netstat -s in the tcp data etc cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NAPI question, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | NAPI: dev.c change to net_rx_action algorithm., Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ifconfig TX/RX errors, Donald Becker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ifconfig TX/RX errors, Donald Becker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |