| To: | Donald Becker <becker@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: via-rhine "reset did not complete" errors |
| From: | Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:35:16 +0100 |
| Cc: | Larry Sendlosky <Larry.Sendlosky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210281425480.1346-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <7BFCE5F1EF28D64198522688F5449D5A03C079@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210281425480.1346-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:38:18 -0500, Donald Becker wrote: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Larry Sendlosky wrote: > > > We're using VIA EPIA mini-ITX with 800Mhz C3 and the > > VT6103 PHY. (via-rhine driver says VT6102). We have made sure > > power supply is "big enough". Our kernel is 2.4.18 with > > via-rhine.c patches to fix TX timeout. > > Those are evil patches... Care to elaborate? Since I wrote the patch to fix the Tx timeout issue, I'd be very interested to learn how exactly it is evil. Roger |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | (no subject), netdev-bounce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: sctp snmp mib stats in /proc/net/snmp, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: via-rhine "reset did not complete" errors, Donald Becker |
| Next by Thread: | RE: via-rhine "reset did not complete" errors, Larry Sendlosky |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |