| To: | Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sendfile64() anyone? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?) |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 24 Oct 2002 03:47:43 -0700 |
| Cc: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200210241230.46848.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200210231218.18733.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200210231542.48673.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1035432669.9628.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200210241230.46848.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 03:30, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > Are there any plans of implementing sendfile64() or sendfile() support for > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64? This is old hat, and appears in every current vendor kernel I am aware of and is in 2.5.x as well. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: O_DIRECT sockets? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?), David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Sysctl for ICMPv6 Rate Limitation, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | sendfile64() anyone? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?), Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sendfile64() anyone? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?), Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |