| To: | Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: O_DIRECT sockets? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?) |
| From: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:34:38 -0700 |
| Cc: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200210231218.18733.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20021023130101.GA646@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3DB6B96F.A0DE47BF@xxxxxxxxxx> <200210231726.21135.roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > I'm doing O_DIRECT read (from disk), so it needs to be user -> kernel, then. > > any chance of using O_DIRECT to the socket? Hmm, I'm still not clear on why you cannot use sendfile()? I was not aware of any upper limit to the file size in order for sendfile() to be used? From what little I know, this is exactly the kind of situation that sendfile was intended to benefit. thanks, Nivedita |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port), Kyle C Quest |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?, bert hubert |
| Previous by Thread: | O_DIRECT sockets? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?), Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: O_DIRECT sockets? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?), Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |